Cartwright, Steve. Seaquest. Activision: 1983. Chapman, Matt, and Mike Chapman. Trogdor. Videlextrix: 2003. Egging, Keith, John Morgan, Mark Blazczyk, Rex Battenberg, Tom Fosha, Phil Raba, Rich Pagnusat, and Charlie Schultz. Zoo Keeper. Taito: 1982. Fenton, Jamie Faye. The Adventures of Robby Roto. Bally / Midway: 1981. Jarvis, Eugene. Defender. Williams: 1981. Jarvis, Eugene. Robotron: 2084. […]
0 out 0 people found the following review helpful 1.5 out of 5 stars This implement (first spied by myself at the Netto Marken-Discount, Zielstattstraße, on a dreary and thirst-streaked morning, April or May of 1917) of questionable ornamentation made its most recent appearance in the last or next to last kitchen, flowering with the […]
[out of nothing] has always and conscientiously avoided the use of the term experimental in describing itself. Perhaps we-as-editors-cum-curators are over-sensitive to this term because our formal education was capstoned at an institution known for self-conscious and so-named experimentation. But we are not ignorant of readerly perceptions, much less the “how”s by which the literary […]
“In 1956, João Guimarães Rosa published his masterpiece, Grande Sertão: Veredas, in his native Brazil. In 1963, an English translation was published in the United States as The Devil to Pay in the Backlands. Due to the highly intricate and complex nature of Guimarães Rosa’s linguistic ingenuity, as well as to an inexperience with the […]
“There were eight scripts, eight historians in all and you must know them if we are to be perfect. Imperfection a fear instilled by ghosts. Turning from menacing to violent, closing in as I ran through the woods, a telltale sign that a copy was subpar, must be amended or discarded altogether. The residue of […]
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nothingness/ + http://smmry.com/ If there is only one empty world and many populated worlds, then a random selection would lead us to expect a populated world. Is there at most one empty world? Most philosophers would grant Peter van Inwagen’s premise that there is no more than one empty world. The Aristotelian empty world differs from the Newtonian empty world because different counterfactual statements are true of it. If variation in empty worlds can be sustained by differences in the laws that apply to them, there will be infinitely many empty worlds. The gravitational constant of an empty world can equal any real number between 0 and 1, so there are more than countably many empty worlds. Since there can be no truthmaker for an empty world, Armstrong appears to have a second objection to the empty world. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nothingness/ + http://smmry.com/ + http://www.spoonbill.org/n+7/ If there is only one empty wraith and many populated wraiths, then a random semicircle would lead us to expect a populated wraith. Is there at most one empty wraith? Most phosphates would grapple Peter […]
“…now we…make use of the great…principle that nothing takes place without a sufficient reason; in other words, that nothing occurs for which it would be impossible for someone who has enough knowledge of things to give a reason adequate to determine why the thing is as it is and not otherwise. This principle having been […]
“If you emptied the universe of all its contents, would you get a pure void?”
“This resource is provided as a free service for those patrons looking for nothing.” “The ultimate unresource. Unembellished blankness.” “Skip to navigation; Skip to main content; Skip to secondary content; Skip to footer.”